What did the Three-Fifths Compromise try to prevent?
Politicians had been trying to avoid the issue of slavery ever since the Constitutional Convention of 1787 reached an uneasy compromise in the form of the "Three-Fifths Clause." This provision declared that the entire free population of a state and 60 percent of its enslaved population would be included in the establishment of the…
What did the Three-Fifths Compromise solve?
The Great Compromise settled questions of representation in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled questions of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans. The Electoral College determined how the president would be elected.
What was the Three-Fifths Compromise kid-friendly?
The Three-Fifths Compromise was that three out of every five slaves would be counted. Delegates from states with large populations of slaves argued that slaves should be considered persons in determining representation, but property if the new government were to collect taxes from the states based on population.
What was the main purpose of the three-fifths compromise?
The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 that allowed southern states to count a portion of its slave population for purposes of taxation and representation.
What was the solution to the Three Fifths Compromise?
The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached among state delegates during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It settled a contentious debate over whether and how slaves should be counted when determining a state's total population. In the end, the solution was to count three out of every five slaves as human.
Why was a compromise made with the slave states?
…to a compromise whereby three-fifths of the slaves would count as population for purposes of representation (and direct taxation). Slave states would thus be forever over-represented in national politics; a law was also added allowing the recapture of fugitive slaves, though in deference to republican scruples….
Compromise and acceptance. A contentious issue at the 1787 Constitutional Convention was whether slaves would be counted as part of the population in determining the representation of the states in Congress or would instead be considered property and, as such, not considered for purposes of representation.
The three-fifths clause would be omitted and possibly replaced with wording stating that "other persons" would not be included in apportionment. The Constitution would thus proclaim that slaves were not human at all (zero fifths).
Is racism enshrined in the United States Constitution? How could the same Founding Fathers who endorsed the idea that all men are created equal also endorse …